Match statistics snapshot
- Wycombe fired more attempts (12 vs 6 shots).
- AFC Wimbledon was more accurate in front of goal (33% on target vs 8%).
- Wycombe held more of the ball (68% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Afc Wimbledon | Statistic | Wycombe |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 4 | Offsides | 3Lead |
| 4 | Shots inside the box | 6Lead |
| 2 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 7Lead |
| 2Lead | Shots on target | 1 |
|---|
| 2 | Shots outside the box | 6Lead |
|---|
| 6 | Total shots | 12Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Afc Wimbledon | Statistic | Wycombe |
|---|---|---|
| 32% | Ball possession | 68%Lead |
| 69% | Pass accuracy | 83%Lead |
| 199 | Accurate passes | 501Lead |
| 289 | Total passes | 601Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Afc Wimbledon | Statistic | Wycombe |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Corner kicks | 7Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Afc Wimbledon | Statistic | Wycombe |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 4Lead |
| Goalkeeper saves | ||
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Afc Wimbledon | Statistic | Wycombe |
|---|---|---|
| 13 | Fouls | 11Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| Yellow cards |