Match statistics snapshot
- Chelsea created the clearer chances on xG (1.97 vs 2.90, Δ 0.93).
- Chelsea fired more attempts (17 vs 16 shots).
- 1.
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| 1. Fc Heidenheim | Statistic | Chelsea |
|---|---|---|
| 1.97 | Expected goals (xG) | 2.90Lead |
| 6 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 10 | Shots inside the box | 15Lead |
| 3 |
| 5Lead |
| 11Lead | Shots on target | 9 |
|---|
| 6Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 16 | Total shots | 17Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| 1. Fc Heidenheim | Statistic | Chelsea |
|---|---|---|
| 33% | Ball possession | 67%Lead |
| 79% | Pass accuracy | 88%Lead |
| 240 | Accurate passes | 554Lead |
| 302 | Total passes | 629Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| 1. Fc Heidenheim | Statistic | Chelsea |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 6Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| 1. Fc Heidenheim | Statistic | Chelsea |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 3Lead |
| 7 | Goalkeeper saves | 11Lead |
| 2.18 | Goals prevented | 2.18 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| 1. Fc Heidenheim | Statistic | Chelsea |
|---|---|---|
| 14 | Fouls | 10Lead |
| 0Lead | Red cards | 1 |
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 5 |