Match statistics snapshot
- 1.
- FC Heidenheim created the clearer chances on xG (3.24 vs 1.52, Δ 1.72).
- 1.
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| 1. Fc Heidenheim | Statistic | Dynamo Dresden |
|---|---|---|
| 3.24Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.52 |
| 4 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 20Lead | Shots inside the box | 12 |
| 11Lead |
| 7 |
| 10Lead | Shots on target | 8 |
|---|
| 7Lead | Shots outside the box | 5 |
|---|
| 27Lead | Total shots | 17 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| 1. Fc Heidenheim | Statistic | Dynamo Dresden |
|---|---|---|
| 37% | Ball possession | 63%Lead |
| 72% | Pass accuracy | 81%Lead |
| 198 | Accurate passes | 403Lead |
| 274 | Total passes | 497Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| 1. Fc Heidenheim | Statistic | Dynamo Dresden |
|---|---|---|
| 6 | Corner kicks | 9Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| 1. Fc Heidenheim | Statistic | Dynamo Dresden |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 6Lead |
| -2.05 | Goals prevented | -2.05 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| 1. Fc Heidenheim | Statistic | Dynamo Dresden |
|---|---|---|
| 8 | Fouls | 6Lead |
| 0Lead | Red cards | 1 |
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |