Match statistics snapshot
- Hamburger SV created the clearer chances on xG (1.55 vs 1.61, Δ 0.06).
- 1.
- FC Heidenheim fired more attempts (20 vs 14 shots).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| 1. Fc Heidenheim | Statistic | Hamburger Sv |
|---|---|---|
| 1.55 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.61Lead |
| 3 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 13Lead | Shots inside the box | 10 |
| 12 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4 |
| 4 | Shots on target | 5Lead |
|---|
| 7Lead | Shots outside the box | 4 |
|---|
| 20Lead | Total shots | 14 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| 1. Fc Heidenheim | Statistic | Hamburger Sv |
|---|---|---|
| 48% | Ball possession | 52%Lead |
| 76% | Pass accuracy | 80%Lead |
| 287 | Accurate passes | 329Lead |
| 378 | Total passes | 413Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| 1. Fc Heidenheim | Statistic | Hamburger Sv |
|---|---|---|
| 10Lead | Corner kicks | 8 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| 1. Fc Heidenheim | Statistic | Hamburger Sv |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Blocked shots | 5Lead |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
| 1.07 | Goals prevented | 1.07 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| 1. Fc Heidenheim | Statistic | Hamburger Sv |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Fouls | 11 |
| Red cards | ||
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 2 |