Match statistics snapshot
- Hertha BSC was more accurate in front of goal (63% on target vs 50%).
- 1.
- FC Heidenheim held more of the ball (54% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| 1. Fc Heidenheim | Statistic | Hertha Bsc |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Offsides | 1 |
| Shots inside the box | ||
| 4Lead | Shots off target | 3 |
| 4 | Shots on target |
| 5Lead |
| Shots outside the box |
|---|
| 8 | Total shots | 8 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| 1. Fc Heidenheim | Statistic | Hertha Bsc |
|---|---|---|
| 54%Lead | Ball possession | 46% |
| Pass accuracy | ||
| Accurate passes | ||
| Total passes |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| 1. Fc Heidenheim | Statistic | Hertha Bsc |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Corner kicks | 1 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| 1. Fc Heidenheim | Statistic | Hertha Bsc |
|---|---|---|
| Blocked shots | ||
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| 1. Fc Heidenheim | Statistic | Hertha Bsc |
|---|---|---|
| 17 | Fouls | 12Lead |
| 0 | Red cards | 0 |
| 2 | Yellow cards | 2 |
Statistics is not available yet.