Match statistics snapshot
- Holstein Kiel created the clearer chances on xG (1.50 vs 1.51, Δ 0.01).
- Holstein Kiel fired more attempts (16 vs 14 shots).
- 1.
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| 1. Fc Heidenheim | Statistic | Holstein Kiel |
|---|---|---|
| 1.50 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.51Lead |
| 1 | Offsides | 1 |
| 8 | Shots inside the box | 8 |
| 6Lead |
| 5 |
| 5Lead | Shots on target | 4 |
|---|
| 6 | Shots outside the box | 8Lead |
|---|
| 14 | Total shots | 16Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| 1. Fc Heidenheim | Statistic | Holstein Kiel |
|---|---|---|
| 38% | Ball possession | 62%Lead |
| 75% | Pass accuracy | 86%Lead |
| 235 | Accurate passes | 446Lead |
| 315 | Total passes | 516Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| 1. Fc Heidenheim | Statistic | Holstein Kiel |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 5Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| 1. Fc Heidenheim | Statistic | Holstein Kiel |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Blocked shots | 7Lead |
| 3Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
| -1.84 | Goals prevented | -1.84 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| 1. Fc Heidenheim | Statistic | Holstein Kiel |
|---|---|---|
| 15 | Fouls | 13Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |