Match statistics snapshot
- 1.
- FC Heidenheim created the clearer chances on xG (1.89 vs 1.85, Δ 0.04).
- 1.
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| 1. Fc Heidenheim | Statistic | Sc Freiburg |
|---|---|---|
| 1.89Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.85 |
| 2 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 13Lead | Shots inside the box | 9 |
| 6Lead |
| 3 |
| 3 | Shots on target | 4Lead |
|---|
| 2 | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 15Lead | Total shots | 11 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| 1. Fc Heidenheim | Statistic | Sc Freiburg |
|---|---|---|
| 52%Lead | Ball possession | 48% |
| 81%Lead | Pass accuracy | 75% |
| 369Lead | Accurate passes | 312 |
| 456Lead | Total passes | 414 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| 1. Fc Heidenheim | Statistic | Sc Freiburg |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Corner kicks | 4 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| 1. Fc Heidenheim | Statistic | Sc Freiburg |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Blocked shots | 4 |
| 2Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| 1. Fc Heidenheim | Statistic | Sc Freiburg |
|---|---|---|
| 20 | Fouls | 12Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 3Lead | Yellow cards | 4 |