Match statistics snapshot
- 1.
- FC Heidenheim created the clearer chances on xG (1.85 vs 0.99, Δ 0.86).
- Union Berlin fired more attempts (10 vs 7 shots).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| 1. Fc Heidenheim | Statistic | Union Berlin |
|---|---|---|
| 1.85Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.99 |
| 2 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 6 | Shots inside the box | 10Lead |
| 4 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 5Lead |
| 3 | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 1Lead | Shots outside the box | 0 |
|---|
| 7 | Total shots | 10Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| 1. Fc Heidenheim | Statistic | Union Berlin |
|---|---|---|
| 45% | Ball possession | 55%Lead |
| 71%Lead | Pass accuracy | 69% |
| 237 | Accurate passes | 277Lead |
| 333 | Total passes | 402Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| 1. Fc Heidenheim | Statistic | Union Berlin |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 5Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| 1. Fc Heidenheim | Statistic | Union Berlin |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Blocked shots | 2Lead |
| 2Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 0 |
| -1.08 | Goals prevented | -1.08 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| 1. Fc Heidenheim | Statistic | Union Berlin |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Fouls | 13 |
| Red cards | ||
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 2 |