Match statistics snapshot
- 1.
- FC Heidenheim created the clearer chances on xG (1.12 vs 1.11, Δ 0.01).
- VfL Wolfsburg fired more attempts (13 vs 12 shots).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| 1. Fc Heidenheim | Statistic | Vfl Wolfsburg |
|---|---|---|
| 1.12Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.11 |
| 2 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 9 | Shots inside the box | 11Lead |
| 6 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 6 |
| 3 | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 3Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 12 | Total shots | 13Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| 1. Fc Heidenheim | Statistic | Vfl Wolfsburg |
|---|---|---|
| 52%Lead | Ball possession | 48% |
| 77% | Pass accuracy | 79%Lead |
| 383Lead | Accurate passes | 371 |
| 500Lead | Total passes | 470 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| 1. Fc Heidenheim | Statistic | Vfl Wolfsburg |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| 1. Fc Heidenheim | Statistic | Vfl Wolfsburg |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Blocked shots | 4Lead |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 3Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| 1. Fc Heidenheim | Statistic | Vfl Wolfsburg |
|---|---|---|
| 11 | Fouls | 10Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 1 |