Match statistics snapshot
- Werder Bremen created the clearer chances on xG (2.34 vs 3.09, Δ 0.75).
- 1.
- FC Heidenheim fired more attempts (18 vs 11 shots).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| 1. Fc Heidenheim | Statistic | Werder Bremen |
|---|---|---|
| 2.34 | Expected goals (xG) | 3.09Lead |
| 1Lead | Offsides | 2 |
| 12Lead | Shots inside the box | 9 |
| 8 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 5 |
| 5Lead | Shots on target | 4 |
|---|
| 6Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 18Lead | Total shots | 11 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| 1. Fc Heidenheim | Statistic | Werder Bremen |
|---|---|---|
| 41% | Ball possession | 59%Lead |
| 74% | Pass accuracy | 80%Lead |
| 240 | Accurate passes | 384Lead |
| 323 | Total passes | 483Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| 1. Fc Heidenheim | Statistic | Werder Bremen |
|---|---|---|
| 10Lead | Corner kicks | 1 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| 1. Fc Heidenheim | Statistic | Werder Bremen |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 2Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| 1. Fc Heidenheim | Statistic | Werder Bremen |
|---|---|---|
| 20 | Fouls | 8Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 1 | Yellow cards | 1 |