Match statistics snapshot
- Cerro Porteno created the clearer chances on xG (0.39 vs 0.98, Δ 0.59).
- Cerro Porteno fired more attempts (8 vs 6 shots).
- Cerro Porteno was more accurate in front of goal (25% on target vs 17%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| 2 De Mayo | Statistic | Cerro Porteno |
|---|---|---|
| 0.39 | Expected goals (xG) | 0.98Lead |
| Offsides | ||
| 4 | Shots inside the box | 4 |
| 2 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3Lead |
| 1 | Shots on target | 2Lead |
|---|
| 2 | Shots outside the box | 4Lead |
|---|
| 6 | Total shots | 8Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| 2 De Mayo | Statistic | Cerro Porteno |
|---|---|---|
| 51%Lead | Ball possession | 49% |
| 70% | Pass accuracy | 73%Lead |
| 224 | Accurate passes | 227Lead |
| 318Lead | Total passes | 312 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| 2 De Mayo | Statistic | Cerro Porteno |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| 2 De Mayo | Statistic | Cerro Porteno |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| 2 De Mayo | Statistic | Cerro Porteno |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Fouls | 8 |
| 1 | Red cards | 0Lead |
| 3Lead | Yellow cards | 4 |
Statistics is not available yet.