Match statistics snapshot
- 2 de Mayo created the clearer chances on xG (2.03 vs 0.37, Δ 1.66).
- 2 de Mayo fired more attempts (13 vs 4 shots).
- Cerro Porteno was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 15%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| 2 De Mayo | Statistic | Cerro Porteno |
|---|---|---|
| 2.03Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.37 |
| 0Lead | Offsides | 1 |
| 9Lead | Shots inside the box | 3 |
| 7Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 2 |
| 2 | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 4Lead | Shots outside the box | 1 |
|---|
| 13Lead | Total shots | 4 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| 2 De Mayo | Statistic | Cerro Porteno |
|---|---|---|
| 43% | Ball possession | 57%Lead |
| 78% | Pass accuracy | 81%Lead |
| 219 | Accurate passes | 317Lead |
| 280 | Total passes | 392Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| 2 De Mayo | Statistic | Cerro Porteno |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| 2 De Mayo | Statistic | Cerro Porteno |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Blocked shots | 0 |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| 2 De Mayo | Statistic | Cerro Porteno |
|---|---|---|
| 17 | Fouls | 10Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 2Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.