Match statistics snapshot
- Aalesund created the clearer chances on xG (1.98 vs 1.18, Δ 0.80).
- Aalesund fired more attempts (18 vs 14 shots).
- Ham-Kam was more accurate in front of goal (43% on target vs 17%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Aalesund | Statistic | Ham-kam |
|---|---|---|
| 1.98Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.18 |
| 1Lead | Offsides | 5 |
| 11Lead | Shots inside the box | 9 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 5 |
| 3 | Shots on target | 6Lead |
|---|
| 7Lead | Shots outside the box | 5 |
|---|
| 18Lead | Total shots | 14 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Aalesund | Statistic | Ham-kam |
|---|---|---|
| 57%Lead | Ball possession | 43% |
| 82%Lead | Pass accuracy | 80% |
| 372Lead | Accurate passes | 272 |
| 454Lead | Total passes | 341 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Aalesund | Statistic | Ham-kam |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Corner kicks | 5 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Aalesund | Statistic | Ham-kam |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 4Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Aalesund | Statistic | Ham-kam |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Fouls | 16 |
| 1 | Red cards | 0Lead |
| 2 | Yellow cards | 2 |