Match statistics snapshot
- Viking created the clearer chances on xG (1.21 vs 2.35, Δ 1.14).
- Aalesund fired more attempts (16 vs 12 shots).
- Viking was more accurate in front of goal (42% on target vs 13%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Aalesund | Statistic | Viking |
|---|---|---|
| 1.21 | Expected goals (xG) | 2.35Lead |
| 1Lead | Offsides | 2 |
| 10Lead | Shots inside the box | 9 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4 |
| 2 | Shots on target | 5Lead |
|---|
| 6Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 16Lead | Total shots | 12 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Aalesund | Statistic | Viking |
|---|---|---|
| 53%Lead | Ball possession | 47% |
| 85%Lead | Pass accuracy | 82% |
| 361Lead | Accurate passes | 301 |
| 425Lead | Total passes | 367 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Aalesund | Statistic | Viking |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Corner kicks | 9Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Aalesund | Statistic | Viking |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 2Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Aalesund | Statistic | Viking |
|---|---|---|
| 9 | Fouls | 8Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 1 | Yellow cards | 0Lead |