Match statistics snapshot
- Brondby created the clearer chances on xG (2.88 vs 2.92, Δ 0.04).
- Aarhus fired more attempts (19 vs 14 shots).
- Brondby was more accurate in front of goal (57% on target vs 47%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Aarhus | Statistic | Brondby |
|---|---|---|
| 2.88 | Expected goals (xG) | 2.92Lead |
| Offsides | ||
| 12Lead | Shots inside the box | 11 |
| 5 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4 |
| 9Lead | Shots on target | 8 |
|---|
| 7Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 19Lead | Total shots | 14 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Aarhus | Statistic | Brondby |
|---|---|---|
| 46% | Ball possession | 54%Lead |
| 83% | Pass accuracy | 86%Lead |
| 396 | Accurate passes | 497Lead |
| 476 | Total passes | 577Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Aarhus | Statistic | Brondby |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Aarhus | Statistic | Brondby |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 5 | Goalkeeper saves | 7Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Aarhus | Statistic | Brondby |
|---|---|---|
| 8 | Fouls | 8 |
| Red cards | ||
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 4 |