Match statistics snapshot
- Aarhus created the clearer chances on xG (1.62 vs 0.91, Δ 0.71).
- Brondby fired more attempts (14 vs 13 shots).
- Aarhus was more accurate in front of goal (23% on target vs 14%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Aarhus | Statistic | Brondby |
|---|---|---|
| 1.62Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.91 |
| 1 | Offsides | 1 |
| 8 | Shots inside the box | 10Lead |
| 7 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 7 |
| 3Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 5Lead | Shots outside the box | 4 |
|---|
| 13 | Total shots | 14Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Aarhus | Statistic | Brondby |
|---|---|---|
| 54%Lead | Ball possession | 46% |
| 81% | Pass accuracy | 81% |
| 313Lead | Accurate passes | 270 |
| 388Lead | Total passes | 335 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Aarhus | Statistic | Brondby |
|---|---|---|
| 10Lead | Corner kicks | 6 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Aarhus | Statistic | Brondby |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Blocked shots | 5Lead |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 2Lead |
| 0.71 | Goals prevented | 0.71 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Aarhus | Statistic | Brondby |
|---|---|---|
| 12Lead | Fouls | 23 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 5 |