Match statistics snapshot
- Aarhus created the clearer chances on xG (3.23 vs 1.10, Δ 2.13).
- Aarhus fired more attempts (12 vs 9 shots).
- FC Copenhagen was more accurate in front of goal (67% on target vs 50%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Aarhus | Statistic | Fc Copenhagen |
|---|---|---|
| 3.23Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.10 |
| 3 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 7Lead | Shots inside the box | 4 |
| 4Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 2 |
| 6 | Shots on target | 6 |
|---|
| 5 | Shots outside the box | 5 |
|---|
| 12Lead | Total shots | 9 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Aarhus | Statistic | Fc Copenhagen |
|---|---|---|
| 50% | Ball possession | 50% |
| 80% | Pass accuracy | 81%Lead |
| 357 | Accurate passes | 363Lead |
| 448 | Total passes | 449Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Aarhus | Statistic | Fc Copenhagen |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Corner kicks | 0 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Aarhus | Statistic | Fc Copenhagen |
|---|---|---|
| 2Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 5Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Aarhus | Statistic | Fc Copenhagen |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Fouls | 7 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 2 |
Statistics is not available yet.