ABFF U17 0-2 ML Vitebsk Prediction

ABFF U17ABFF U17
0 — 2FT
ML VitebskML Vitebsk
OverviewLineupsStatisticsStandingsEventsPlayersPredictionsFormInjuriesH2H

Updated

Abff U17Abff U17vsMl VitebskMl Vitebsk

Match DNA · Predictions ↗

Balanced — model leans Ml Vitebsk

Estimated win chances: Abff U17 25.9%, draw 25.2%, Ml Vitebsk 48.9%. From 28 and 28 competition matches.

TempoMedium
VolatilityLow
Expected goalsMedium
Tactical styleBalanced
Upset potentialMedium
Draw riskMedium
Model confidenceHigh

Outcome model

Sportra's estimate from each team's season goal rates. It is a statistical guide, not betting advice.

Goal expectancy

1.07Expected goals1.57

From 28 and 28 competition matches

Likely scorelines (Poisson)

  • 1–112.3%
  • 0–111.5%
  • 1–29.7%
  • 0–29%
  • 1–07.8%

Form & momentum

Weighted momentum, recent result run, and form-window W–D–L — the live pulse before kickoff.

28Cold spellAbff U17
Weighted momentum

Ml Vitebsk arrives with stronger form weighting (+42 momentum).

70Hot streakMl Vitebsk
Abff U17 · High-risk / fragileMl Vitebsk · compact defense · hot form

Abff U17

6W · 5D · 17L
Recent →DLLWLDLLWDDLDLWLLWLLLWLLLLLW
Momentum index

Ml Vitebsk

17W · 4D · 7L
Recent →WLWWWWDWWWLWWWLLWLWLDWWWDDLW
Momentum index

Form split comparison

Wins, draws, and losses across the sampled form window

Season record

League totals anchoring the snapshot — points, goal balance, and season shape vs opponent.

Table gapMl Vitebsk +32

Abff U17

23 pts
21% wins

6W · 5D · 17L · 28 played

For
27
Against
47
Goal diff -20

Ml Vitebsk

55 pts
61% wins

17W · 4D · 7L · 28 played

For
54
Against
22
Goal diff +32

Season shape comparison

League table W–D–L, goal balance, and form-run counts from league profile signals

League depth signals

Extremes, discipline windows, and split stats from the full league profile.

Matchup edges

Attack vs opponent defense in the matchup comparison.

  • Abff U17 offensive edge

    Abff U17 faces a stingier defense than their attack rating suggests.

    -57
  • Ml Vitebsk offensive edge

    Ml Vitebsk's attack (79%) vs Abff U17's defense (22%).

    +57

Team comparison

Comparison indices from the match data partner.

Attack rating

Attacking threat in the final third.

Abff U1721
Ml Vitebsk79

Defense rating

How well each side limits chances.

Abff U1722
Ml Vitebsk78

Momentum

Weighted form score (recent results count more).

Abff U1728
Ml Vitebsk70

Matchup edge

Attack vs opponent defense (positive = favourable matchup).

Abff U17-64
Ml Vitebsk164

Volatility

Higher = more swingy results (big losses, goals against).

Abff U1734
Ml Vitebsk30

Form index

Head-to-head form comparison from the model.

Abff U1725
Ml Vitebsk75

H2H pull

Historical dominance in recent meetings.

Abff U170
Ml Vitebsk100
Abff U17High-risk / fragile
Ml Vitebskcompact defense · hot form

H2H in this snapshot

From 1 meeting included in this prediction snapshot.

1Abff U17100%
0Draws
0Ml Vitebsk0%

Recent meetings

ML Vitebsk
3 – 0FT
ABFF U17

1. DivisionRound 6