Match statistics snapshot
- Como created the clearer chances on xG (0.92 vs 0.99, Δ 0.07).
- Como fired more attempts (15 vs 9 shots).
- Como held more of the ball (58% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Ac Milan | Statistic | Como |
|---|---|---|
| 0.92 | Expected goals (xG) | 0.99Lead |
| 0Lead | Offsides | 2 |
| 8Lead | Shots inside the box | 7 |
| 4 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3 |
| 3 | Shots on target | 6Lead |
|---|
| 1 | Shots outside the box | 8Lead |
|---|
| 9 | Total shots | 15Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Ac Milan | Statistic | Como |
|---|---|---|
| 42% | Ball possession | 58%Lead |
| 82% | Pass accuracy | 88%Lead |
| 263 | Accurate passes | 385Lead |
| 321 | Total passes | 437Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Ac Milan | Statistic | Como |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Corner kicks | 5Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Ac Milan | Statistic | Como |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 6Lead |
| 5Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
| -1.21 | Goals prevented | -1.21 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Ac Milan | Statistic | Como |
|---|---|---|
| 21 | Fouls | 7Lead |
| 0Lead | Red cards | 1 |
| 3 | Yellow cards | 3 |