Match statistics snapshot
- Como created the clearer chances on xG (0.77 vs 1.33, Δ 0.56).
- Como fired more attempts (10 vs 6 shots).
- AC Milan was more accurate in front of goal (67% on target vs 40%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Ac Milan | Statistic | Como |
|---|---|---|
| 0.77 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.33Lead |
| 5 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 5 | Shots inside the box | 7Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3Lead |
| 4 | Shots on target | 4 |
|---|
| 1 | Shots outside the box | 3Lead |
|---|
| 6 | Total shots | 10Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Ac Milan | Statistic | Como |
|---|---|---|
| 54%Lead | Ball possession | 46% |
| 91% | Pass accuracy | 91% |
| 461Lead | Accurate passes | 401 |
| 509Lead | Total passes | 443 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Ac Milan | Statistic | Como |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Corner kicks | 4 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Ac Milan | Statistic | Como |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Blocked shots | 3Lead |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 3 |
| 0.07 | Goals prevented | 0.07 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Ac Milan | Statistic | Como |
|---|---|---|
| 11Lead | Fouls | 12 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |