Match statistics snapshot
- AC Milan created the clearer chances on xG (1.17 vs 0.72, Δ 0.45).
- Frosinone fired more attempts (15 vs 10 shots).
- AC Milan was more accurate in front of goal (30% on target vs 20%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Ac Milan | Statistic | Frosinone |
|---|---|---|
| 1.17Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.72 |
| 1 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 5 | Shots inside the box | 6Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 6Lead |
| 3 | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 5 | Shots outside the box | 9Lead |
|---|
| 10 | Total shots | 15Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Ac Milan | Statistic | Frosinone |
|---|---|---|
| 47% | Ball possession | 53%Lead |
| 86%Lead | Pass accuracy | 85% |
| 350 | Accurate passes | 393Lead |
| 408 | Total passes | 465Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Ac Milan | Statistic | Frosinone |
|---|---|---|
| 6 | Corner kicks | 7Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Ac Milan | Statistic | Frosinone |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Blocked shots | 6Lead |
| 2Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Ac Milan | Statistic | Frosinone |
|---|---|---|
| 11 | Fouls | 6Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 1 | Yellow cards | 1 |