Match statistics snapshot
- Inter created the clearer chances on xG (0.90 vs 1.97, Δ 1.07).
- Inter fired more attempts (16 vs 13 shots).
- Inter was more accurate in front of goal (31% on target vs 15%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Ac Milan | Statistic | Inter |
|---|---|---|
| 0.90 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.97Lead |
| 2 | Offsides | 2 |
| 8 | Shots inside the box | 10Lead |
| 9 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 6 |
| 2 | Shots on target | 5Lead |
|---|
| 5 | Shots outside the box | 6Lead |
|---|
| 13 | Total shots | 16Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Ac Milan | Statistic | Inter |
|---|---|---|
| 57%Lead | Ball possession | 43% |
| 84%Lead | Pass accuracy | 77% |
| 394Lead | Accurate passes | 270 |
| 470Lead | Total passes | 350 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Ac Milan | Statistic | Inter |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Corner kicks | 3Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Ac Milan | Statistic | Inter |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 5Lead |
| 3Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Ac Milan | Statistic | Inter |
|---|---|---|
| 14Lead | Fouls | 16 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |