Match statistics snapshot
- AC Milan created the clearer chances on xG (2.17 vs 2.05, Δ 0.12).
- AC Milan fired more attempts (15 vs 11 shots).
- AC Milan was more accurate in front of goal (40% on target vs 27%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Ac Milan | Statistic | Inter |
|---|---|---|
| 2.17Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 2.05 |
| 1Lead | Offsides | 5 |
| 12Lead | Shots inside the box | 8 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 6 |
| 6Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 15Lead | Total shots | 11 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Ac Milan | Statistic | Inter |
|---|---|---|
| 52%Lead | Ball possession | 48% |
| 87%Lead | Pass accuracy | 85% |
| 445Lead | Accurate passes | 409 |
| 510Lead | Total passes | 480 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Ac Milan | Statistic | Inter |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Ac Milan | Statistic | Inter |
|---|---|---|
| 3Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 5Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Ac Milan | Statistic | Inter |
|---|---|---|
| 19 | Fouls | 10Lead |
| 2 | Red cards | 1Lead |
| 3 | Yellow cards | 2Lead |