Match statistics snapshot
- HJK Helsinki created the clearer chances on xG (0.61 vs 4.35, Δ 3.74).
- HJK Helsinki fired more attempts (22 vs 4 shots).
- HJK Helsinki held more of the ball (62% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Ac Oulu | Statistic | Hjk Helsinki |
|---|---|---|
| 0.61 | Expected goals (xG) | 4.35Lead |
| 3 | Offsides | 2Lead |
| 3 | Shots inside the box | 18Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 8Lead |
| 1 | Shots on target | 7Lead |
|---|
| 1 | Shots outside the box | 4Lead |
|---|
| 4 | Total shots | 22Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Ac Oulu | Statistic | Hjk Helsinki |
|---|---|---|
| 38% | Ball possession | 62%Lead |
| 74% | Pass accuracy | 84%Lead |
| 210 | Accurate passes | 371Lead |
| 283 | Total passes | 440Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Ac Oulu | Statistic | Hjk Helsinki |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Corner kicks | 13Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Ac Oulu | Statistic | Hjk Helsinki |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Blocked shots | 6Lead |
| 6Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Ac Oulu | Statistic | Hjk Helsinki |
|---|---|---|
| 11Lead | Fouls | 18 |
| 0 | Red cards | 0 |
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |