Match statistics snapshot
- Ilves created the clearer chances on xG (1.68 vs 2.86, Δ 1.18).
- Ilves fired more attempts (15 vs 7 shots).
- Ilves was more accurate in front of goal (53% on target vs 29%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Ac Oulu | Statistic | Ilves |
|---|---|---|
| 1.68 | Expected goals (xG) | 2.86Lead |
| 1Lead | Offsides | 3 |
| 4 | Shots inside the box | 11Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 5Lead |
| 2 | Shots on target | 8Lead |
|---|
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 4Lead |
|---|
| 7 | Total shots | 15Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Ac Oulu | Statistic | Ilves |
|---|---|---|
| 35% | Ball possession | 65%Lead |
| 77% | Pass accuracy | 85%Lead |
| 207 | Accurate passes | 469Lead |
| 269 | Total passes | 550Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Ac Oulu | Statistic | Ilves |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Corner kicks | 8Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Ac Oulu | Statistic | Ilves |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 4Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Ac Oulu | Statistic | Ilves |
|---|---|---|
| 15 | Fouls | 13Lead |
| 0 | Red cards | 0 |
| 2 | Yellow cards | 2 |