Match statistics snapshot
- UTC Cajamarca fired more attempts (12 vs 5 shots).
- UTC Cajamarca was more accurate in front of goal (42% on target vs 0%).
- Academia Cantolao held more of the ball (61% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Academia Cantolao | Statistic | Utc Cajamarca |
|---|---|---|
| 0Lead | Offsides | 1 |
| 3 | Shots inside the box | 7Lead |
| 4 | Shots off target | 5Lead |
| 0 |
| Shots on target |
|---|
| 5Lead |
| 2 | Shots outside the box | 5Lead |
|---|
| 5 | Total shots | 12Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Academia Cantolao | Statistic | Utc Cajamarca |
|---|---|---|
| 61%Lead | Ball possession | 39% |
| 73%Lead | Pass accuracy | 57% |
| 296Lead | Accurate passes | 143 |
| 404Lead | Total passes | 251 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Academia Cantolao | Statistic | Utc Cajamarca |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | Corner kicks | 6Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Academia Cantolao | Statistic | Utc Cajamarca |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 2Lead |
| 5Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 0 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Academia Cantolao | Statistic | Utc Cajamarca |
|---|---|---|
| 16Lead | Fouls | 24 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |
Statistics is not available yet.