Match statistics snapshot
- UTC Cajamarca fired more attempts (18 vs 9 shots).
- Academia Cantolao was more accurate in front of goal (67% on target vs 17%).
- Academia Cantolao held more of the ball (60% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Academia Cantolao | Statistic | Utc Cajamarca |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 2Lead | Offsides | 4 |
| 9 | Shots inside the box | 10Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 10Lead |
| 6Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 0 | Shots outside the box | 8Lead |
|---|
| 9 | Total shots | 18Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Academia Cantolao | Statistic | Utc Cajamarca |
|---|---|---|
| 60%Lead | Ball possession | 40% |
| 82%Lead | Pass accuracy | 72% |
| 318Lead | Accurate passes | 175 |
| 389Lead | Total passes | 244 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Academia Cantolao | Statistic | Utc Cajamarca |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Corner kicks | 9Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Academia Cantolao | Statistic | Utc Cajamarca |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Blocked shots | 5Lead |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Academia Cantolao | Statistic | Utc Cajamarca |
|---|---|---|
| 19 | Fouls | 15Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 3 |
Statistics is not available yet.