Match statistics snapshot
- Cambridge United created the clearer chances on xG (0.57 vs 1.41, Δ 0.84).
- Cambridge United fired more attempts (14 vs 5 shots).
- Cambridge United held more of the ball (76% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Accrington St | Statistic | Cambridge United |
|---|---|---|
| 0.57 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.41Lead |
| 2 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 5 | Shots inside the box | 11Lead |
| 1 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 8Lead |
| 1 | Shots on target | 3Lead |
|---|
| 0 | Shots outside the box | 3Lead |
|---|
| 5 | Total shots | 14Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Accrington St | Statistic | Cambridge United |
|---|---|---|
| 24% | Ball possession | 76%Lead |
| 50% | Pass accuracy | 80%Lead |
| 100 | Accurate passes | 478Lead |
| 202 | Total passes | 599Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Accrington St | Statistic | Cambridge United |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Corner kicks | 12Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Accrington St | Statistic | Cambridge United |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 2Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 0 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Accrington St | Statistic | Cambridge United |
|---|---|---|
| 8 | Fouls | 3Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 0Lead |