Match statistics snapshot
- Cheltenham created the clearer chances on xG (0.67 vs 1.20, Δ 0.53).
- Accrington ST fired more attempts (16 vs 13 shots).
- Accrington ST was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 31%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Accrington St | Statistic | Cheltenham |
|---|---|---|
| 0.67 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.20Lead |
| Offsides | ||
| 6 | Shots inside the box | 10Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 6Lead |
| 8Lead | Shots on target | 4 |
|---|
| 10Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 16Lead | Total shots | 13 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Accrington St | Statistic | Cheltenham |
|---|---|---|
| 43% | Ball possession | 57%Lead |
| 64% | Pass accuracy | 71%Lead |
| 191 | Accurate passes | 282Lead |
| 299 | Total passes | 400Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Accrington St | Statistic | Cheltenham |
|---|---|---|
| 10Lead | Corner kicks | 8 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Accrington St | Statistic | Cheltenham |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 5Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Accrington St | Statistic | Cheltenham |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Fouls | 10 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 2 |
Statistics is not available yet.