Match statistics snapshot
- Chesterfield created the clearer chances on xG (0.92 vs 2.87, Δ 1.95).
- Accrington ST fired more attempts (14 vs 13 shots).
- Accrington ST was more accurate in front of goal (43% on target vs 23%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Accrington St | Statistic | Chesterfield |
|---|---|---|
| 0.92 | Expected goals (xG) | 2.87Lead |
| 2 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 6 | Shots inside the box | 11Lead |
| 4 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4 |
| 6Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 8Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 14Lead | Total shots | 13 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Accrington St | Statistic | Chesterfield |
|---|---|---|
| 47% | Ball possession | 53%Lead |
| 70% | Pass accuracy | 72%Lead |
| 246 | Accurate passes | 275Lead |
| 352 | Total passes | 382Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Accrington St | Statistic | Chesterfield |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Corner kicks | 7Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Accrington St | Statistic | Chesterfield |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Blocked shots | 6Lead |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 6Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Accrington St | Statistic | Chesterfield |
|---|---|---|
| 10Lead | Fouls | 13 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |