Match statistics snapshot
- Accrington ST fired more attempts (16 vs 15 shots).
- Forest Green was more accurate in front of goal (33% on target vs 25%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Accrington St | Statistic | Forest Green |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 2 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 8 | Shots inside the box | 10Lead |
| 8Lead |
| 5 |
| 4 | Shots on target | 5Lead |
|---|
| 8Lead | Shots outside the box | 5 |
|---|
| 16Lead | Total shots | 15 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Accrington St | Statistic | Forest Green |
|---|---|---|
| 48% | Ball possession | 52%Lead |
| 69% | Pass accuracy | 71%Lead |
| 261 | Accurate passes | 289Lead |
| 378 | Total passes | 409Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Accrington St | Statistic | Forest Green |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Corner kicks | 5Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Accrington St | Statistic | Forest Green |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Blocked shots | 5Lead |
| 4Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Accrington St | Statistic | Forest Green |
|---|---|---|
| 13 | Fouls | 12Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 1 | Yellow cards | 1 |
Statistics is not available yet.