Match statistics snapshot
- Accrington ST created the clearer chances on xG (1.35 vs 0.50, Δ 0.85).
- Accrington ST fired more attempts (10 vs 9 shots).
- Accrington ST was more accurate in front of goal (30% on target vs 11%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Accrington St | Statistic | Gillingham |
|---|---|---|
| 1.35Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.50 |
| 2 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 5Lead | Shots inside the box | 4 |
| 4Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3 |
| 3Lead | Shots on target | 1 |
|---|
| 5 | Shots outside the box | 5 |
|---|
| 10Lead | Total shots | 9 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Accrington St | Statistic | Gillingham |
|---|---|---|
| 56%Lead | Ball possession | 44% |
| 61%Lead | Pass accuracy | 50% |
| 187Lead | Accurate passes | 124 |
| 308Lead | Total passes | 248 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Accrington St | Statistic | Gillingham |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Accrington St | Statistic | Gillingham |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Blocked shots | 5Lead |
| 0 | Goalkeeper saves | 2Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Accrington St | Statistic | Gillingham |
|---|---|---|
| 12Lead | Fouls | 15 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 2 |
Statistics is not available yet.