Match statistics snapshot
- Accrington ST created the clearer chances on xG (1.46 vs 0.68, Δ 0.78).
- Peterborough fired more attempts (14 vs 10 shots).
- Accrington ST was more accurate in front of goal (70% on target vs 21%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Accrington St | Statistic | Peterborough |
|---|---|---|
| 1.46Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.68 |
| Offsides | ||
| 9Lead | Shots inside the box | 8 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 5Lead |
| 7Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 1 | Shots outside the box | 6Lead |
|---|
| 10 | Total shots | 14Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Accrington St | Statistic | Peterborough |
|---|---|---|
| 28% | Ball possession | 72%Lead |
| 59% | Pass accuracy | 82%Lead |
| 130 | Accurate passes | 472Lead |
| 221 | Total passes | 575Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Accrington St | Statistic | Peterborough |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Corner kicks | 8Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Accrington St | Statistic | Peterborough |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 6Lead |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 6Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Accrington St | Statistic | Peterborough |
|---|---|---|
| 17Lead | Fouls | 18 |
| Red cards | ||
| 6 | Yellow cards | 2Lead |