Match statistics snapshot
- Leoben fired more attempts (10 vs 9 shots).
- Admira Wacker was more accurate in front of goal (44% on target vs 10%).
- Leoben held more of the ball (53% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Admira Wacker | Statistic | Leoben |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 1Lead | Offsides | 4 |
| Shots inside the box | ||
| 4 |
| 5Lead |
| 4Lead | Shots on target | 1 |
|---|
| Shots outside the box |
|---|
| 9 | Total shots | 10Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Admira Wacker | Statistic | Leoben |
|---|---|---|
| 47% | Ball possession | 53%Lead |
| Pass accuracy | ||
| Accurate passes | ||
| Total passes |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Admira Wacker | Statistic | Leoben |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Corner kicks | 6Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Admira Wacker | Statistic | Leoben |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 4Lead |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 2Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Admira Wacker | Statistic | Leoben |
|---|---|---|
| 12 | Fouls | 10Lead |
| 0 | Red cards | 0 |
| 1 | Yellow cards | 1 |
Statistics is not available yet.