Match statistics snapshot
- Wolfsberger AC fired more attempts (19 vs 9 shots).
- Admira Wacker was more accurate in front of goal (56% on target vs 37%).
- Admira Wacker held more of the ball (53% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Admira Wacker | Statistic | Wolfsberger Ac |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Offsides | 4 |
| 8 | Shots inside the box | 12Lead |
| 2 | Shots off target | 9Lead |
| Shots on target |
|---|
| 7Lead |
| 1 | Shots outside the box | 7Lead |
|---|
| 9 | Total shots | 19Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Admira Wacker | Statistic | Wolfsberger Ac |
|---|---|---|
| 53%Lead | Ball possession | 47% |
| 74% | Pass accuracy | 74% |
| 302Lead | Accurate passes | 268 |
| 407Lead | Total passes | 362 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Admira Wacker | Statistic | Wolfsberger Ac |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Corner kicks | 5Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Admira Wacker | Statistic | Wolfsberger Ac |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 3Lead |
| 5Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Admira Wacker | Statistic | Wolfsberger Ac |
|---|---|---|
| 15 | Fouls | 12Lead |
| 0 | Red cards | 0 |
| 3 | Yellow cards | 0Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.