Match statistics snapshot
- ADO Den Haag fired more attempts (22 vs 15 shots).
- Cambuur was more accurate in front of goal (47% on target vs 36%).
- ADO Den Haag held more of the ball (57% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Ado Den Haag | Statistic | Cambuur |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 3 | Offsides | 3 |
| 12Lead | Shots inside the box | 10 |
| 7 |
| 7 |
| 8Lead | Shots on target | 7 |
|---|
| 10Lead | Shots outside the box | 5 |
|---|
| 22Lead | Total shots | 15 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Ado Den Haag | Statistic | Cambuur |
|---|---|---|
| 57%Lead | Ball possession | 43% |
| 80%Lead | Pass accuracy | 72% |
| 361Lead | Accurate passes | 250 |
| 452Lead | Total passes | 346 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Ado Den Haag | Statistic | Cambuur |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Corner kicks | 4 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Ado Den Haag | Statistic | Cambuur |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 6Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Ado Den Haag | Statistic | Cambuur |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Fouls | 18 |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 2Lead |