Match statistics snapshot
- Cienciano created the clearer chances on xG (0.81 vs 1.72, Δ 0.91).
- Cienciano fired more attempts (19 vs 9 shots).
- ADT was more accurate in front of goal (33% on target vs 16%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Adt | Statistic | Cienciano |
|---|---|---|
| 0.81 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.72Lead |
| 5 | Offsides | 3Lead |
| 3 | Shots inside the box | 12Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 13Lead |
| 3 | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 6 | Shots outside the box | 7Lead |
|---|
| 9 | Total shots | 19Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Adt | Statistic | Cienciano |
|---|---|---|
| 47% | Ball possession | 53%Lead |
| 72% | Pass accuracy | 75%Lead |
| 204 | Accurate passes | 228Lead |
| 284 | Total passes | 302Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Adt | Statistic | Cienciano |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 11Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Adt | Statistic | Cienciano |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 3Lead |
| 3Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Adt | Statistic | Cienciano |
|---|---|---|
| 16 | Fouls | 6Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 3 |
Statistics is not available yet.