Match statistics snapshot
- ADT fired more attempts (24 vs 15 shots).
- Cusco was more accurate in front of goal (60% on target vs 38%).
- ADT held more of the ball (57% possession).
Adt vs Cusco
Attacking
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Adt | Statistic | Cusco |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 2 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 11 | Shots inside the box | 12Lead |
| 9Lead | Shots off target | 5 |
| 9 | Shots on target | 9 |
| 13Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
| 24Lead | Total shots | 15 |
Possession & passing
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Adt | Statistic | Cusco |
|---|---|---|
| 57%Lead | Ball possession | 43% |
| 77%Lead | Pass accuracy | 71% |
| 285Lead | Accurate passes | 203 |
| 369Lead | Total passes | 286 |
Set pieces
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Adt | Statistic | Cusco |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | Corner kicks | 7Lead |
Defensive & goalkeeping
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Adt | Statistic | Cusco |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 7 | Goalkeeper saves | 9Lead |
Discipline
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Adt | Statistic | Cusco |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Fouls | 14 |
| 0Lead | Red cards | 1 |
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 2 |