Match statistics snapshot
- ADT fired more attempts (18 vs 12 shots).
- ADT was more accurate in front of goal (39% on target vs 25%).
- ADT held more of the ball (56% possession).
Adt vs Cusco
Attacking
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Adt | Statistic | Cusco |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| Offsides | ||
| 7 | Shots inside the box | 7 |
| 3 | Shots off target | 7Lead |
| 7Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
| 11Lead | Shots outside the box | 5 |
| 18Lead | Total shots | 12 |
Possession & passing
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Adt | Statistic | Cusco |
|---|---|---|
| 56%Lead | Ball possession | 44% |
| 74% | Pass accuracy | 75%Lead |
| 320Lead | Accurate passes | 255 |
| 434Lead | Total passes | 341 |
Set pieces
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Adt | Statistic | Cusco |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Corner kicks | 4 |
Defensive & goalkeeping
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Adt | Statistic | Cusco |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 8Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Discipline
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Adt | Statistic | Cusco |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Fouls | 10 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |