Match statistics snapshot
- ADT fired more attempts (24 vs 4 shots).
- Cusco was more accurate in front of goal (75% on target vs 50%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Adt | Statistic | Cusco |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 1Lead | Offsides | 2 |
| 15Lead | Shots inside the box | 3 |
| 7Lead | Shots off target |
| 1 |
| 12Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 9Lead | Shots outside the box | 1 |
|---|
| 24Lead | Total shots | 4 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Adt | Statistic | Cusco |
|---|---|---|
| 52%Lead | Ball possession | 48% |
| 87%Lead | Pass accuracy | 83% |
| 360Lead | Accurate passes | 330 |
| 416Lead | Total passes | 400 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Adt | Statistic | Cusco |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Adt | Statistic | Cusco |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Blocked shots | 0 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 10Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Adt | Statistic | Cusco |
|---|---|---|
| 11 | Fouls | 5Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |