Match statistics snapshot
- ADT created the clearer chances on xG (1.69 vs 0.35, Δ 1.34).
- UTC Cajamarca was more accurate in front of goal (38% on target vs 23%).
- ADT held more of the ball (57% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Adt | Statistic | Utc Cajamarca |
|---|---|---|
| 1.69Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.35 |
| 3 | Offsides | 2Lead |
| 7Lead | Shots inside the box | 6 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 6 |
| 3 | Shots on target | 5Lead |
|---|
| 6 | Shots outside the box | 7Lead |
|---|
| 13 | Total shots | 13 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Adt | Statistic | Utc Cajamarca |
|---|---|---|
| 57%Lead | Ball possession | 43% |
| 81%Lead | Pass accuracy | 71% |
| 292Lead | Accurate passes | 178 |
| 361Lead | Total passes | 251 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Adt | Statistic | Utc Cajamarca |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Corner kicks | 5Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Adt | Statistic | Utc Cajamarca |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Blocked shots | 2Lead |
| 4Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Adt | Statistic | Utc Cajamarca |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Fouls | 10 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |
Statistics is not available yet.