Match statistics snapshot
- ADT fired more attempts (14 vs 12 shots).
- ADT was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 25%).
- UTC Cajamarca held more of the ball (63% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Adt | Statistic | Utc Cajamarca |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 2 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 9Lead | Shots inside the box | 6 |
| 5 |
| 6Lead |
| 7Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 5 | Shots outside the box | 6Lead |
|---|
| 14Lead | Total shots | 12 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Adt | Statistic | Utc Cajamarca |
|---|---|---|
| 37% | Ball possession | 63%Lead |
| 76% | Pass accuracy | 84%Lead |
| 207 | Accurate passes | 401Lead |
| 273 | Total passes | 480Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Adt | Statistic | Utc Cajamarca |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Adt | Statistic | Utc Cajamarca |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 3Lead |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 3Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Adt | Statistic | Utc Cajamarca |
|---|---|---|
| 14 | Fouls | 12Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 3 |
Statistics is not available yet.