Match statistics snapshot
- AEL created the clearer chances on xG (1.73 vs 1.21, Δ 0.52).
- AEL fired more attempts (15 vs 11 shots).
- Apoel Nicosia was more accurate in front of goal (55% on target vs 33%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Ael | Statistic | Apoel Nicosia |
|---|---|---|
| 1.73Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.21 |
| 0Lead | Offsides | 2 |
| 10 | Shots inside the box | 10 |
| 4 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3 |
| 5 | Shots on target | 6Lead |
|---|
| 5Lead | Shots outside the box | 1 |
|---|
| 15Lead | Total shots | 11 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Ael | Statistic | Apoel Nicosia |
|---|---|---|
| 52%Lead | Ball possession | 48% |
| 79% | Pass accuracy | 82%Lead |
| 316Lead | Accurate passes | 288 |
| 400Lead | Total passes | 350 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Ael | Statistic | Apoel Nicosia |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Ael | Statistic | Apoel Nicosia |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 3 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Ael | Statistic | Apoel Nicosia |
|---|---|---|
| 12Lead | Fouls | 16 |
| 0 | Red cards | 0 |
| 1 | Yellow cards | 1 |
Statistics is not available yet.