Match statistics snapshot
- Nea Salamis created the clearer chances on xG (2.19 vs 3.02, Δ 0.83).
- AEL fired more attempts (14 vs 12 shots).
- AEL was more accurate in front of goal (57% on target vs 42%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Ael | Statistic | Nea Salamis |
|---|---|---|
| 2.19 | Expected goals (xG) | 3.02Lead |
| 3 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 9Lead | Shots inside the box | 7 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4 |
| 8Lead | Shots on target | 5 |
|---|
| 5 | Shots outside the box | 5 |
|---|
| 14Lead | Total shots | 12 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Ael | Statistic | Nea Salamis |
|---|---|---|
| 43% | Ball possession | 57%Lead |
| 85% | Pass accuracy | 87%Lead |
| 301 | Accurate passes | 394Lead |
| 356 | Total passes | 452Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Ael | Statistic | Nea Salamis |
|---|---|---|
| 11Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Ael | Statistic | Nea Salamis |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 3Lead |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 3Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Ael | Statistic | Nea Salamis |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Fouls | 18 |
| 0 | Red cards | 0 |
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 2 |
Statistics is not available yet.