Goal expectancy
1.08Expected goals1.02
From 10 and 10 competition matches
Likely scorelines (Poisson)
Defensive grind — too close to call
Estimated win chances: Afad 36.6%, draw 29.9%, Soa 33.5%. From 10 and 10 competition matches.
Low tempo / cageyTempoMedium
VolatilityLow
Expected goalsLow
Tactical styleDefensive grind
Upset potentialMedium
Draw riskHigh
Model confidenceLow
Outcome model
Sportra's estimate from each team's season goal rates. It is a statistical guide, not betting advice.
Form & momentum
Weighted momentum, recent result run, and form-window W–D–L — the live pulse before kickoff.
23Cold spellAfad
Weighted momentum
Soa arrives with stronger form weighting (+20 momentum).
43MixedSoa
Afad · low scoring · cold formSoa · Structured / conservative
Afad
1W · 4D · 5LRecent →DLDLLDWDLL
Momentum index
Soa
3W · 3D · 4LRecent →DDLWWDLWLL
Momentum index
Form split comparison
Wins, draws, and losses across the sampled form window
Season record
League totals anchoring the snapshot — points, goal balance, and season shape vs opponent.
Table gapSoa +5
Afad
7 pts10% wins
1W · 4D · 5L · 10 played
For7
Against12
Soa
12 pts30% wins
3W · 3D · 4L · 10 played
For8
Against9
Season shape comparison
League table W–D–L, goal balance, and form-run counts from league profile signals
League depth signals
Matchup edges
Attack vs opponent defense in the matchup comparison.
- Afad offensive edge
Afad faces a stingier defense than their attack rating suggests.
-57 - Soa offensive edge
Soa's attack (100%) vs Afad's defense (43%).
+57
Team comparison
Comparison indices from the match data partner.
Afadlow scoring · cold form
SoaStructured / conservative
H2H in this snapshot
From 4 meetings included in this prediction snapshot.
1Afad25%
3Draws
0Soa0%