Match statistics snapshot
- AFC Amsterdam fired more attempts (22 vs 16 shots).
- Blauw Geel was more accurate in front of goal (69% on target vs 32%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Afc Amsterdam | Statistic | Blauw Geel |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 2 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 11 | Shots inside the box | 12Lead |
| 10Lead |
| 5 |
| 7 | Shots on target | 11Lead |
|---|
| 11Lead | Shots outside the box | 4 |
|---|
| 22Lead | Total shots | 16 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Afc Amsterdam | Statistic | Blauw Geel |
|---|---|---|
| 50% | Ball possession | 50% |
| 71% | Pass accuracy | 72%Lead |
| 413Lead | Accurate passes | 411 |
| 578Lead | Total passes | 573 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Afc Amsterdam | Statistic | Blauw Geel |
|---|---|---|
| 6 | Corner kicks | 8Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Afc Amsterdam | Statistic | Blauw Geel |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Blocked shots | 0 |
| 10Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 4 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Afc Amsterdam | Statistic | Blauw Geel |
|---|---|---|
| 10Lead | Fouls | 11 |
| Red cards | ||
| Yellow cards |
Statistics is not available yet.