Match statistics snapshot
- Orebro SK fired more attempts (17 vs 14 shots).
- AFC Eskilstuna was more accurate in front of goal (36% on target vs 18%).
- Orebro SK held more of the ball (55% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Afc Eskilstuna | Statistic | Orebro Sk |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 10 | Shots inside the box | 13Lead |
| 7 | Shots off target | 12Lead |
| Shots on target |
|---|
| 3 |
| 4 | Shots outside the box | 4 |
|---|
| 14 | Total shots | 17Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Afc Eskilstuna | Statistic | Orebro Sk |
|---|---|---|
| 45% | Ball possession | 55%Lead |
| 79% | Pass accuracy | 81%Lead |
| 314 | Accurate passes | 365Lead |
| 395 | Total passes | 453Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Afc Eskilstuna | Statistic | Orebro Sk |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 9Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Afc Eskilstuna | Statistic | Orebro Sk |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Afc Eskilstuna | Statistic | Orebro Sk |
|---|---|---|
| 19 | Fouls | 6Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 4 | Yellow cards | 0Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.