Match statistics snapshot
- AFC Eskilstuna fired more attempts (13 vs 3 shots).
- Osters IF was more accurate in front of goal (67% on target vs 38%).
- AFC Eskilstuna held more of the ball (59% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Afc Eskilstuna | Statistic | Osters If |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| Shots inside the box | ||
| 8Lead | Shots off target | 1 |
| 5 |
| Shots on target |
|---|
| 2 |
| Shots outside the box |
|---|
| 13Lead | Total shots | 3 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Afc Eskilstuna | Statistic | Osters If |
|---|---|---|
| 59%Lead | Ball possession | 41% |
| Pass accuracy | ||
| Accurate passes | ||
| Total passes |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Afc Eskilstuna | Statistic | Osters If |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Afc Eskilstuna | Statistic | Osters If |
|---|---|---|
| Blocked shots | ||
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Afc Eskilstuna | Statistic | Osters If |
|---|---|---|
| 12Lead | Fouls | 14 |
| 0 | Red cards | 0 |
| 1 | Yellow cards | 1 |
Statistics is not available yet.