Match statistics snapshot
- AFC Hermannstadt created the clearer chances on xG (1.50 vs 0.92, Δ 0.58).
- AFC Hermannstadt fired more attempts (20 vs 15 shots).
- Farul Constanta was more accurate in front of goal (40% on target vs 25%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Afc Hermannstadt | Statistic | Farul Constanta |
|---|---|---|
| 1.50Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.92 |
| 2 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 9 | Shots inside the box | 10Lead |
| 6Lead | Shots off target | 3 |
|---|
| 5 | Shots on target | 6Lead |
|---|
| 11Lead | Shots outside the box | 5 |
|---|
| 20Lead | Total shots | 15 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Afc Hermannstadt | Statistic | Farul Constanta |
|---|---|---|
| 52%Lead | Ball possession | 48% |
| 77%Lead | Pass accuracy | 74% |
| 318Lead | Accurate passes | 281 |
| 411Lead | Total passes | 379 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Afc Hermannstadt | Statistic | Farul Constanta |
|---|---|---|
| 6 | Corner kicks | 8Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Afc Hermannstadt | Statistic | Farul Constanta |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Blocked shots | 6 |
| 6 | Goalkeeper saves | 6 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Afc Hermannstadt | Statistic | Farul Constanta |
|---|---|---|
| 12Lead | Fouls | 14 |
| Red cards | ||
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 2 |
Statistics is not available yet.