Match statistics snapshot
- AFC Hermannstadt created the clearer chances on xG (2.33 vs 1.17, Δ 1.16).
- AFC Hermannstadt fired more attempts (16 vs 12 shots).
- Universitatea Cluj held more of the ball (72% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Afc Hermannstadt | Statistic | Universitatea Cluj |
|---|---|---|
| 2.33Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.17 |
| 0Lead | Offsides | 1 |
| 11Lead | Shots inside the box | 5 |
| 9Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 6 |
| 5Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 5 | Shots outside the box | 7Lead |
|---|
| 16Lead | Total shots | 12 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Afc Hermannstadt | Statistic | Universitatea Cluj |
|---|---|---|
| 28% | Ball possession | 72%Lead |
| 79% | Pass accuracy | 91%Lead |
| 226 | Accurate passes | 694Lead |
| 286 | Total passes | 766Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Afc Hermannstadt | Statistic | Universitatea Cluj |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Corner kicks | 5Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Afc Hermannstadt | Statistic | Universitatea Cluj |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 3Lead |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 3Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Afc Hermannstadt | Statistic | Universitatea Cluj |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Fouls | 11 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1 | Yellow cards | 1 |